- Jersey Finance
- |23/7/25
Jersey continues to strengthen its position as a leading jurisdiction for private fund structures, offering certainty, flexibility, and cost efficiency. With robust regulation aligned with international standards, Jersey provides an attractive alternative to other domiciles such as the Cayman Islands. Its pragmatic and adaptive regulatory framework ensures Jersey remains a future-proof and stable choice for fund managers operating in an increasingly complex global environment.
Why Choose Jersey?
The JPF Order and the updated JPF Guide come into effect on 6 August 2025 and will automatically apply to new JPFs from this date.
A Jersey Private Fund (JPF) is a private investment fund involving the pooling of capital raised for the fund and which operates on the principle of risk spreading.
Importantly, however, the following are expressly stated as not being intended to fall within the definition of a JPF:
1. holding companies;
2. joint ventures;
3. securitisation vehicles;
4. family office vehicles; and
5. carry/incentivisation vehicles.
The definition of private fund captures any company, unit trust or partnership that offers or issues or has issued its non-redeemable investment interests, the purpose or effect of which is the pooling of investor funds with the aim of enabling investors to receive profits or gains from such entity’s acquisition, holding, management or disposal of investments, where:
(a) the holders of investment interests do not have day-to-day control over the acquisition, holding, management or disposal of the investments; and
(b) the investments are managed as a whole by or on behalf of the operator of the private fund directly or indirectly, but does not include (among other things) any non-fund arrangements including, for example, holding vehicles, joint ventures, proprietary vehicles, debt issuing vehicles, employee incentive schemes, structured finance vehicles.
Feature | Jersey | Cayman |
Audit Requirement | Not mandatory for JPFs (unless agreed by investors or required by structure) | Mandatory annual audit; statements must be filed with CIMA |
Number of Investors | No investor/offer cap from 6 August 2025 | N/A |
Investor Type | Professional investors only | N/A |
Approval Timeline | 24 hours | Registration with CIMA; timelines vary |
Directors Requirement | No mandatory Jersey resident director, but at least one expected | At least 2 natural persons required; no local residency requirement |
Designated Service Provider (DSP) | Mandatory; must be a regulated Jersey entity | No DSP requirement, but compliance obligations apply |
AML/CFT Compliance | DSP and JPF must comply with Jersey AML/CFT laws | Comprehensive AML/CFT regime applies |
Tax Neutrality | Yes | Yes |
EU access | Marketing under national private placement regimes (NPPRs) | Marketing under national private placement regimes (NPPRs) |
Service Providers
Tax and Transparency
Jersey continues to be internationally recognised for its robust regulatory standards:
Jersey’s longstanding reputation for transparency and international cooperation makes it a stable and reliable jurisdiction for both investors and managers. In contrast, some jurisdictions have faced increased scrutiny in recent years, including listings that may complicate EU market access. For those seeking long-term certainty and ease of cross-border marketing, Jersey offers a clear path forward.
Jersey has developed a well-respected and forward-thinking funds sector that offers regimes from retail options through to the more sophisticated and institutional end of the market.
Our factsheet provides a more detailed explanation of the key features of a JPF.
We are proud that our high standards and commitment to transparency have been recognised on numerous occasions by independent authorities including the OECD, IMF and World Bank. Jersey has also been recognised as one of the leading jurisdictions worldwide for compliance with the FATF standards during its most recent MONEYVAL Mutual Evaluation Report (MER). Jersey was ‘compliant’ or ‘largely compliant’ with 39 out of 40 FATF recommendations, a level of technical compliance achieved by only a few jurisdictions worldwide.
View our Tax and Transparency Timeline